If I’m going to run bitwarden_rs and mysql in separate containers (using docker compose), do I use the server-mysql image, or do I use the server image and just change the DATABASE_URL setting?
As soon as you have a bitwarden client, and you connect to it from time to time, then its already a backup because even if server down you can still get the passwords it had last time. So you can export it and import it in a fresh bitwarden instance if ever the server broke or something. I would NOT setup a VPN just for bitwarden. Also, the most recent versions of the bitwardenrs/server:testing container has multi-database support now, and can be used for sqlite3, mysql/mariadb and postgresql. I don’t see anything strange in this command. What do you see in the bitwarden.log file located at /home/bitwardenrs/?
Related confusion:
Docker Hub images have the same dockerfile
I’m pretty new to Docker, etc, so maybe this isn’t an issue.
When I look at the individual Docker Hub pages for the bitwarden_rs images with different back ends, I expect to see different contents on the “Dockerfile” tab. This makes me think that the mysql and postgres images aren’t built correctly.
Compare:
Bitwarden Postgresql Command
Bitwarden Postgresql
The PostgreSQL one is the same, but as a new user I can only post two links.